Evidence mapPaperPMID 42416953Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Unmasking Atypical Eating Disorders: A Case Series Highlighting Diagnostic Delays and Underrecognized Populations.

Karan Prasad, Brendan Driscoll, Felicia Gallucci

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karan PrasadPsychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Brendan DriscollPsychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Felicia GallucciPsychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical eating disorder presentations challenge traditional diagnostic frameworks, leading to underdiagnosis and diagnostic delay, as each patient had prior clinical contacts in which eating disorder pathology went unrecognized. This study examines four cases highlighting unique risk factors, including high-performance athletics, trauma history, substance use, gender dysphoria, and environmental stressors. These patients were not identified as having eating disorders at initial clinical contact, as presenting complaints, including anxiety, alcohol use disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and environmental stressors, obscured the underlying eating pathology.  Athletes, particularly those in weight-class sports, may engage in restrictive eating while maintaining higher body weight, as seen in Case 1. Trauma history increases vulnerability, yet routine screening remains inadequate. Case 2 demonstrates the interplay between alcohol use disorder and binge-purge cycles, where substance use masked eating pathology. Gender dysphoria in Case 3 contributed to restrictive behaviors as a means of body modification, underscoring the importance of integrating gender-affirming care. Case 4 illustrates how environmental instability can drive disordered eating independent of body image concerns. These cases emphasize the necessity of broadening screening criteria and provider education to recognize atypical presentations. Addressing coexisting psychiatric conditions and social determinants of health is critical for early intervention and improved outcomes in patients with eating disorders.

Indexed as

atypical eating disordersbody image disturbanceseating disordersother specified feeding or eating disordersunderdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42416953
PMCPMC13340857

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.