ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Tracking the Evolutionary Trajectory of a Young Hybrid Plant Pathogen.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common mechanism by which emerging plant pathogens gain the ability to infect new hosts is hybridization. Despite its widespread occurrence, the outcomes of hybridization remain largely unpredictable within current evolutionary frameworks, making empirical studies key for identifying patterns and establishing principles underlying hybrid evolution. Here, we track the evolutionary trajectory of Blumeria graminis forma specialis triticale (B.g. triticale), or triticale powdery mildew, a pathogen that emerged recently through hybridization of two powdery mildew forms specialized on wheat (B.g. tritici) and rye (B.g. secalis). Using a genomic dataset of 652 isolates from the three formae speciales, we show that they persist as three isolated lineages. Results from our infection assays and sampling suggest that B.g. triticale is not well adapted to infect wheat under field conditions, indicating that isolation between B.g. tritici and B.g. triticale may be maintained by partial niche separation. We investigated the genomic changes following hybridization and found that at least a third of the hybrid genome is fixed for B.g. tritici ancestry in contemporary populations, and around 1% is fixed for the B.g. secalis ancestry. We identified several loci to be under recent positive selection in B.g. triticale, most of which coincide with known genes and regions of fixed or nearly fixed local ancestry. Overall, we highlight the role of ecological isolation in preventing gene flow between B.g. triticale and its parental lineages. We reveal the rapid stabilization of its genome after hybridization and show that some of these changes were likely shaped by selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.