Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42417773›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026

[Gender inequality: implications for the relationship between food insecurity and obesity in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil].

Luana Teixeira Ghiggino, Talita Barbosa Domingos, Rosana Salles-Costa, Aline Alves Ferreira

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luana Teixeira GhigginoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-2812
Talita Barbosa DomingosUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-5266
Rosana Salles-CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-4083
Aline Alves FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-3462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the association between food insecurity and obesity in adult heads of household considering the differences between men and women. This cross-sectional study used data from the I Survey on Food Insecurity in the City of Rio de Janeiro. Adults (aged 20-59 years) who headed households (n = 1,026) were analyzed. Food security and food insecurity levels (mild and moderate/severe) were assessed by the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. Self-reported weight and height were used to estimate obesity, assessed by body mass index. Associations between families' food insecurity levels and obesity were estimated by multinomial logistic models (relative risk ratios - RRR - and their 95% confidence intervals - 95%CI) on Stata software. Women with mild (RRR = 2.8; 95%CI: 1.3-5.8) and moderate/severe food insecurity (RRR = 2.5; 95%CI: 1.0-6.4) had a higher risk of obesity. food insecurity constituted a risk factor for obesity only in women, with no statistically significant results in men, showing how gender inequality amplifies the adverse effects of food insecurity on female-headed households, compromising the quality and quantity of their diet.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityFood SupplyObesityAdultBody Mass IndexBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42417773
PMCPMC13336607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.