ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2026
Compliance with the Netherlands' vitamin D supplementation recommendation for three at-risk groups: young children, women over 50 years, and elderly.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo prevent vitamin D deficiency subgroups are advised to daily take a vitamin D supplement. Knowledge on the compliance with this recommendation is limited. For young children, women over 50 yrs, and elderly, the supplementation recommendation is independent of sunlight exposure. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate compliance with the supplementation recommendation for these groups.
methodsData on young children (1-3 yrs, n = 703), women (50-69 yrs, n = 451), and elderly (70-79 yrs, n = 331) from the Dutch National Food and Consumption Survey (DNFCS) 2019-2021 were analysed for vitamin D-containing supplement use. With a general questionnaire (GQ) information was collected on frequency of use of sub-types of supplements (e.g. vitamin D, vitamin D & calcium, multivitamin, multivitamins-minerals). In two 24-h dietary recalls, use of supplements was reported in detail; e.g. type and dosage.
results71% of young children, 38% of women, and 40% of elderly reported use of vitamin D-containing supplements (GQ: 80%, 55%, and 50%, respectively). Among supplement users, 70% of young children, 30% of women, and 35% of elderly used exactly the advised dosage.
conclusionCompliance with vitamin D supplementation recommendation was high in young children and could be improved most among women over 50 years and elderly. Further research is needed to identify effective strategies to improve compliance in these groups. In addition, to ensure that the supplementation recommendations are effective in achieving adequate vitamin D status, regular monitoring of vitamin D status and related health outcomes in all target groups is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.