ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Pediatric surgical care of anorectal malformations: a global survey.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAll patients born with anorectal malformations (ARMs) deserve high-quality healthcare, including appropriate neonatal screening, perioperative management, and long-term follow-up. This study examined global pediatric surgical practices for ARM management, identifying areas of consensus and variability in perioperative care and reported outcomes.
methodsA multi-center survey distributed by The Hendren Project (a global networked community of pediatric surgeons) invited surgeons to retrospectively review their ten most recent primary ARM reconstructions, excluding reoperations. Data were compared by country/continent and World Bank income.
resultsA total of 144 surgeons from 90 hospitals in 50 countries reported outcomes for 900 patients. Sacral radiographs were inconsistently obtained, with 34.2% lacking lateral views and 21.9% missing anterior-posterior views. The complication rate after PSARP was 27.2%, including dehiscence (11.7%), wound infection (7.4%), and stricture (6.9%). Divided stomas were more common than loop colostomies (66.3% versus 28.8%). Postoperative anal dilations were performed by 92.6% of surgeons. Reported complication rates did not differ significantly by region or income category.
conclusionThis global survey demonstrates wide regional and income-based variability in ARM perioperative care, spanning screening, operative strategy, timing, and postoperative management. Inconsistent sacral and spinal screening, especially in low-resource settings, highlights needs for standardized pathways and context-aware quality improvement efforts worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417975What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.