Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418240›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Using Electronic Health Records to Enhance Lyme Disease Surveillance: Protocol for the SubLyme Network.

Annemarie G Hirsch, Brian S Schwartz, Melissa N Poulsen, Anna M Schotthoefer, Maria E Sundaram, Jacob E Lemieux, Linden T Hu, Robert P Smith, Alexandra M Linz, Steph Battan-Wraith and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Annemarie G HirschDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-2171
Brian S SchwartzDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0739-9865
Melissa N PoulsenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-371X
Anna M SchotthoeferIntegrated Research and Development Laboratory, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0675-719X
Maria E SundaramCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8056-3302
Jacob E LemieuxMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2758-4005
Linden T HuTufts School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-5558
Robert P SmithMaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2222-9810
Alexandra M LinzIntegrated Research and Development Laboratory, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-4810
Steph Battan-WraithWestat, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-1653
Patrick K MitchellWestat, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-0846
Cassandra A HathawayWestat, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-0499
Jonathan S PollakDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2505-5606
Cara M NordbergDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-5332
Veronica BurkelDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-2693
Courtney C Nawrocki LuskinDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-6480
Kiersten J KugelerDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-6688
Alison F HinckleyDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-5165
Sarah A HookDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-1053

Funding

JG CDC HHS 75D30123C18239JG CDC HHS 75D30124C18824JG CDC HHS 75D30124C18869JG CDC HHS 75D30124C19955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLyme disease is the most common vector-borne illness in the United States. The limitations of traditional surveillance strategies for Lyme disease affect the ability to reliably track its burden and evaluate interventions. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Surveillance Based Lyme Disease Network (SubLyme) in September 2023 to strengthen Lyme disease surveillance and research using electronic health record (EHR) data.

objectiveSubLyme has three primary objectives: (1) to establish and evaluate criteria for identifying Lyme disease cases in EHR data (ie, create computable phenotypes [CPs]) that can be scaled across diverse health systems, (2) to estimate Lyme disease incidence, and (3) to describe Lyme disease incidence by key demographics. Secondary objectives are to develop CPs that distinguish between acute and disseminated Lyme disease, identify clinical manifestations, and support future research efforts. This paper describes SubLyme, its structure, and its methods.

methodsSubLyme includes 5 health systems in 3 US regions with a high risk of Lyme disease: Geisinger, in Pennsylvania; Marshfield Clinic Health System, in Wisconsin; and Mass General Brigham, Tufts Medical Center, and MaineHealth in New England. The network is administered by a coordinating center (Westat) and the US CDC. SubLyme is evaluating the validity of EHR-based CP definitions for Lyme disease. CP performance is assessed by measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value against manually abstracted medical charts. Each site identified a cohort of patients with any Lyme disease element in their EHR (Lyme disease diagnosis code, Lyme disease laboratory test order, and Lyme-appropriate antibiotic order) during 2022 to 2023 and selected 500 charts for manual review as the gold standard against which CP performance was evaluated. SubLyme will use the Lyme disease CPs to generate incidence rates for Lyme disease overall and for various subgroups.

resultsSubLyme identified 332,256 patients with at least 1 Lyme disease element in their record from more than 4.6 million patients. Of these patients, 55.6% (n=184,734) were female, 87.9% (n=292,053) were White, and 90.8% (n=301,688) were non-Hispanic. More than half of the patients only had a Lyme-appropriate medication order (n=177,425, 53.4%) and 35.8% (n=118,948) only had a Lyme disease test order. The most common combination was a medication order with a laboratory test order (n=22,926, 6.9%), followed by a combination of a diagnosis, test, and medication order (n=5316, 1.6%).

conclusionsSubLyme is well positioned to advance Lyme disease surveillance using EHR data across multiple health systems. The exploration of new surveillance methods in Lyme disease is critical as disease frequency increases and the geography expands. An EHR-based approach to surveillance has the potential to overcome challenges of current surveillance strategies and to accelerate Lyme disease research. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/94921.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLyme DiseasePopulation SurveillanceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.HumansIncidenceUnited StatesBorrelia burgdorferielectronic health recordLyme diseasesurveillancetick-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID42418240
PMCPMC13392523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.