ArticlePloS one2026
Value dynamics and interpersonal tension among astronauts during International Space Station missions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Astronauts' ability to maintain motivation over extended periods is crucial for space mission success. This paper examines how motivational goals (personal values) change during space missions and explores the associations between perceived value congruence and intra-crew tension among astronauts staying 4-7 months at the International Space Station. Twelve astronauts regularly completed the Crew Values Questionnaire (CVQ) package, assessing personal values, perceived value congruence of crew members, and tension attributed to perceived value incongruence. Overall, they rated their values, particularly universalism, benevolence, and tradition, as highly concordant. Temporal analyses showed that scores for hedonism and power increased early in missions and declined later, while benevolence and security decreased and rose again towards the end and into post-mission. Perceived value-congruence followed similar trajectories, with differences in achievement, power, and benevolence decreasing and then increasing across mission phases. Multilevel modeling showed that perceived incongruence in seven out of eight personal values significantly predicted interpersonal tension. In conclusion, in-mission adjustments of value priorities may have helped astronauts sustain motivation, but these shifts could also influence crew dynamics. Pre-mission training and in-flight support should target shifts in motivational sources and manage interpersonal tensions from value diversity to prevent adverse outcomes and leverage crew heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.