Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418800›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (REMOTION and Res-Up!) for Clients From Psychotherapy Waitlists in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus-TOP): Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leonie Franziska Trimpop, Laura Luisa Bielinski, Jan Schürmann-Vengels, Sebastian Appelbaum, Thomas Berger, Ulrike Willutzki

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonie Franziska TrimpopDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, Witten, 58448, Germany, 49 2302-926-9704.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-4442
Laura Luisa BielinskiDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-6253
Jan Schürmann-VengelsDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, Witten, 58448, Germany, 49 2302-926-9704.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-1129
Sebastian AppelbaumDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, Witten, 58448, Germany, 49 2302-926-9704.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-2486
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7791
Ulrike WillutzkiDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, Witten, 58448, Germany, 49 2302-926-9704.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-4554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Internet-based interventions can improve treatment accessibility, prevent chronicity, and reduce waiting times. Despite their potential, the effectiveness of transdiagnostic internet-based interventions for individuals on waiting lists, and their integration into routine care, remains insufficiently evaluated. Objective: This study aimed to compare 2 transdiagnostic web-based interventions focusing on improving emotion regulation and resilience to a control group (CG) in individuals recruited from waiting lists for routine outpatient psychotherapy. Methods: At 4 outpatient centers in Germany, 421 adult participants were recruited from respective waiting lists and randomized into 1 of 2 intervention groups (ie, "REMOTION" and "Res-Up!") or the CG without access to the interventions. Participants were not restricted from accessing face-to-face psychotherapy during the course of the study. Assessments occurred at baseline, 6 weeks after intervention, and at 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was symptom severity. The secondary outcomes focused on emotion regulation and resilience. Other outcomes included depressive symptoms, self-compassion, and self-esteem. Results: No significant differences were found between the intervention groups and the CG for the primary outcome symptom severity, although all groups significantly improved over time. The secondary outcomes for emotion regulation improvement found significant between-group differences only when comparing REMOTION to CG in acceptance of negative emotions. For resilience and all other outcomes, most groups improved significantly over time, but treatment groups did not differ from CG. Conclusions: Although we were able to find significant improvements across time for the treatment groups, participants in the CG improved significantly as well. Findings for between-group interactions show small additional benefits for participation in REMOTION for emotion regulation compared to the CG only. The study provides information for future research concerning the effectiveness of and difficulties in implementing transdiagnostic internet-based interventions during waiting times for psychotherapy. Our findings suggest that transdiagnostic internet-based interventions do not seem to be more effective than simply waiting for psychotherapy.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionOutpatientsPsychotherapyWaiting ListsAdultEmotional RegulationFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle Agedemotion regulationinternet-based therapyrandomized controlled trialRCTresiliencetransdiagnosticwaitlist

Identifiers

PMID42418800
PMCPMC13345349

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.