Observational studyBMJ open respiratory research2026
Patient-reported outcomes after surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer and perceptions of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes.
Observational study in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical resection is essential in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), followed by rehabilitation with physical exercise training to improve physical capacity, quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden. In Denmark, rehabilitation is municipality-based and not disease-specific and without a maintenance model. We aimed to investigate QoL and symptoms 6-12 months after NSCLC surgery, hypothesising impaired QoL and symptom levels. Moreover, we explored rehabilitation attendance.
methodsAn observational, cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted from March to June 2025 across two Danish regions in patients after surgery for stage I or II NSCLC and without adjuvant oncological treatment (preregistration: osf.io/vmpft). Each site contacted their own eligible patients via digital mail. Registry data from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry and electronic patient registries: socio-demographics, disease-specific characteristics and surgical procedure. Survey data: QoL and symptoms burden (measure: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; Reporting: Raw and transformed scores and dichotomised according to defined thresholds and cut-offs for clinical importance) and self-reported information about rehabilitation attendance. DATA ANALYSES: descriptive and stratified analyses.
resultsWe identified 168 patients, 94 (56% of 168) were eligible and 67 (71% of 94) responded to the survey. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and overall mean time since surgery was 8.9±1.8 months. Current QoL and symptoms were clinically impaired (eg, physical functioning: 51%; dyspnoea: 70%). Around half (54%) reported having attended a rehabilitation programme and those having attended were more likely to have clinically impaired physical functioning and dyspnoea at present.
conclusionsQoL and symptoms were impaired 6-12 months after NSCLC surgery, and the current level did not seem to be related to having attended a postsurgical rehabilitation programme. Disease-specific challenges should be addressed in future rehabilitation and maintenance models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.