ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026
Explainable machine learning revealing the impact of mental and physical health on arthritis.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a robust and interpretable machine learning framework for arthritis risk prediction and to identify important risk factors associated with the disease.
methodsThis study used four datasets, which are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2019, BRFSS 2021, National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2020 and NHIS 2022. We evaluated 11 machine learning and deep learning architectures including a custom stacked ensemble combined with five resampling techniques to address class imbalance and 9 imputation methods to handle missing data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity and balanced accuracy are used to evaluate model performance, with fivefold cross-validation to ensure robustness. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided feature interpretability in prediction.
resultsThe combination of the stacked ensemble, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) imputation and random undersampling (RUS) achieved the best performance with an AUROC of 0.8007 and sensitivity of 0.8060 in the test set of BRFSS 2019. This combination also showed a balanced performance across both subgroups of male and female by maintaining high performance with AUROC of 0.808 and 0.800, respectively, in the test set of BRFSS 2021. The stacked ensemble model with GAN imputation and either Random Undersampling (RUS) or Random Oversampling (ROS) achieved the best performance across all four datasets. SHAP analysis identified higher age, walking difficulty and high body mass index (BMI) as the top physical factors. Among the psychosocial factors, parental separation showed a high impact on predicting arthritis. DISCUSSION: The risk of arthritis is influenced by health, lifestyle and childhood experiences. SHAP shows that difficulty walking, age, BMI and childhood stress play important roles in predicting arthritis risk.
conclusionThese results confirm important predictors of arthritis risk and provide a clear, interpretable framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.