ArticleBMJ open2026
'Just opt for caesarean section and pick the birthdate': a qualitative study exploring women's delivery preferences after caesarean section in urban Tanzania.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore perspectives, preferences and decision-making regarding mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section among women in urban Tanzania.
designA descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
settingA private tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
participants11 women with one previous caesarean section who delivered at the study site were interviewed on the third day after delivery. Participants were purposively sampled to include both modes of delivery: five women underwent repeat caesarean section and six attempted a trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC).
resultsThematic analysis identified four key themes: (1) social and cultural influences, (2) physical and emotional experiences, (3) desire for emotional support and relief from labour pain and (4) balancing medical advice with personal beliefs. Misinformation, inconsistent counselling and strong social influences were prominent factors that often led women to prefer repeat caesarean section even when vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) was medically feasible.
conclusionsWomen's delivery preferences after caesarean section are shaped by social influences, personal experiences and inconsistent healthcare counselling. While findings suggest opportunities to improve patient-centred communication, broader implementation of VBAC requires alignment across multiple levels of the healthcare system, including provider training, institutional protocols and supportive infrastructure which were beyond the scope of this study. Further research incorporating healthcare provider perspectives and diverse settings is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.