Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420635›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Perioperative and peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis: general and urology-specific recommendations from the German Interdisciplinary S3 guideline].

Katharina Hauner, Jennifer Kranz, Florian Wagenlehner, Sonja Hansen, Gernot Bonkat, Giuseppe Magistro, Matthias May

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharina HaunerKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, TUM Universitätsklinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland. Katharina.Hauner@mri.tum.de.
Jennifer KranzArbeitskreis Infektiologie und Hygiene der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V. (DGU), Berlin, Deutschland.
Florian WagenlehnerArbeitskreis Infektiologie und Hygiene der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V. (DGU), Berlin, Deutschland.
Sonja HansenInstitut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Gernot Bonkatalta Uro AG, Merian Iselin Klinik, Center of Biomechanics and Calorimetry, University of Basel, Basel, Schweiz.
Giuseppe MagistroArbeitskreis Infektiologie und Hygiene der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V. (DGU), Berlin, Deutschland.
Matthias MayArbeitskreis Infektiologie und Hygiene der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V. (DGU), Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative and peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is a central instrument for the prevention of infectious complications, yet it has to consider concerns of individual and general patient safety, antibiotic stewardship, and antibiotic resistance dynamics. The interdisciplinary AWMF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlicher Fachgesellschaften) S3 guideline finalized in 2024 (AWMF S3, 2024) provides a comprehensive, evidence-based framework for indication, substance selection, dosing, timing, and quality assurance of PAP across all surgical disciplines, with a dedicated chapter for preselected urological procedures.

methodsThe guideline was developed in accordance with the AWMF standards, employing systematic literature searches with GRADE evaluation, operationalizing recommendations, statements, and expert consensus, and anchoring implementation in structure-, process-, and outcome-oriented quality indicators. Urological procedures were defined using the PICOS framework and furnished with evidence-based recommendations. In addition, the recommendations are compared with those of the 2025 EAU Guideline on Urological Infections.

resultsGeneral key statements are precise indication for antibiotic use, intravenous administration 30-60 min before incision, single-dose application for the majority of interventions, redosing only in case of extended operating time or major blood loss, and termination of PAP at the end of surgery. For urology, the following apply: for transrectal prostate biopsy, PAP shall be administered, ideally targeted according to rectal swab findings. For transperineal biopsy, PAP may be omitted if urinary tract infection has been excluded and adequate skin antisepsis ensured; in high-risk patients, PAP should be administered. For elective transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), PAP is mandatory, whereas for transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB), prophylaxis is recommended only in patients at increased risk. For radical cystectomy, PAP shall be administered in all cases. For extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), routine prophylaxis should not be used, although it may be considered in high-risk situations. For minimally invasive tumor ablations and interventional radiological procedures such as prostatic artery embolization (PAE) routine prophylaxis is not indicated, although selective use may be justified in patients at risk.

conclusionThe 2024 AWMF S3 guideline on PAP provides a robust foundation for interventional and operative urology, uniting infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship. It enables risk-adapted reduction of unnecessary antibiotic use without compromising safety and shows broad consistency with the EAU recommendations on prophylaxis in urological procedures.

Indexed as

Antibiotic prophylaxisAntibiotic stewardshipResistanceS3 guidelineUrology

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.