ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Biomechanics of Plaque Rupture and Cardiovascular Calcification.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rupture of an atheroma cap can lead to the formation of a thrombus, followed by a myocardial infarction. The development of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerable to rupture results from complex interactions among systemic, biological, and biomechanical factors. During pulsatile blood flow, the arterial wall experiences various mechanical stresses, including wall shear stresses (WSS) and vessel wall stresses. The ultimate stress needed to cause cap rupture is about five orders of magnitude greater than physiological WSS. Therefore, physiological or elevated WSS cannot cause rupture of the atheroma cap. However, WSS is crucial for the formation and progression of atheroma as well as the development of high-vulnerability traits within the atheroma. In turn, the ultimate tensile stress in the cap tissue depends on several factors, including the morphology, tissue composition, and the biochemical and biological environment of the atheroma. Key factors that increase stress in the vessel wall include a positively remodeled atheroma with low stenosis, containing soft, large lipid or necrotic pools, and a thin fibrous cap. The ultimate tensile stress of the cap tissue also depends on collagen content and crosslinking, increased macrophage numbers, matrix metalloproteinases secretion, chronic inflammation, smooth muscle cell apoptosis, neovascularization, intraplaque hemorrhage, coagulation factors, and the development of microcalcifications in the cap. The complex interaction between these factors can result in vessel wall stresses exceeding the ultimate stress threshold and leading to atheroma cap rupture. The role of calcification on the biomechanics of the atheroma and, in particular, the role of microcalcifications in increasing the risk of cap rupture are summarized. Overall, understanding the complex interplay of morphology, composition, and biological environment in the atheroma is essential for advancing our understanding of plaque rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420707What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.