ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Advancing PEGylated Drug Evaluation: A Novel Approach to Pegfilgrastim Pharmacokinetic Assessment.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-PEG Antibodies From mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Affect In Vitro Measurements of Pegylated Drug Levels.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Advancing PEGylated Drug Evaluation: A Novel Approach to Pegfilgrastim Pharmacokinetic Assessment.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG), or PEGylation, is a modification that extends the half-life of drug products, thereby reducing the frequency of dosing. However, PEGylation can pose challenges for biosimilar drug development, as replicating the reference product's PEG characteristics to achieve similarity to the reference product's pharmacokinetics (PK) can be difficult. A few biosimilar product submissions have highlighted issues with PK assays, potentially contributing to failures in PK similarity assessment. With many approved PEGylated protein therapeutics soon becoming eligible for biosimilar development, developing alternative methods for PK assessment that can be applied across multiple product categories may help to facilitate a more efficient biosimilar development program. We previously validated an ELISA-based method and observed significant variability even in samples prepared with known drug concentrations. We decided that a cell-based assay (CBA) might offer greater translatability to other PEGylated products. CBAs rely on cells with receptors for the drug product being tested, and the choice of cell line would vary depending on the specific drug product. In this study, we utilized pegfilgrastim, a PEGylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) product, for PK determination using the CBA method. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that while the sensitivity of the CBA is lower than that of the validated ELISA, its ability to capture receptor-accessible drug provides an important advantage for pharmacokinetic assessment. Moreover, it exhibits good reproducibility and can be read using a 96-well platform. This CBA approach may be a viable option for the rapid development of PK assays for other PEGylated drug products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.