ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Vascular-aware mixture-of-experts with a texture-enhanced decoder for accurate X-ray vessel segmentation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate vessel segmentation in X-ray angiography (XRA) is essential for diagnosing coronary artery disease and supporting interventional procedures. However, low contrast, complex backgrounds, and substantial variation in vessel caliber make accurate segmentation challenging, especially for thin vessels.
methodsWe propose a Vascular-Aware Mixture-of-Experts (VA-MoE) framework for XRA vessel segmentation. The model incorporates Dynamic Snake Convolution (DSnC) to capture the elongated and curved morphology of vessels and a Texture-Enhanced Decoder (TED) to recover fine spatial details and suppress background noise during upsampling. The proposed framework was evaluated on three representative datasets: ARCADE, DCA1, and XCAD.
resultsVA-MoE achieved an IoU of 87.80% and a Dice coefficient of 93.08% on ARCADE, an IoU of 65.18% and a Dice coefficient of 78.03% on DCA1, and an IoU of 67.52% and a Dice coefficient of 79.93% on XCAD. Compared with the strongest baseline methods, VA-MoE improved IoU and Dice by 2.77 and 1.21 percentage points on ARCADE, by 2.40 and 2.10 percentage points on DCA1, and by 2.89 and 1.50 percentage points on XCAD, respectively. Qualitative results further suggested improved topological continuity and better preservation of thin peripheral vessels compared with competing methods.
conclusionThe proposed VA-MoE framework provides a promising solution for XRA vessel segmentation. By jointly enhancing vascular structural modeling and texture recovery, it may support automated cardiovascular image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.