ArticleBMC medicine2026
Development and validation of a novel multimodal deep neural network model based on CBC digit parameters and scattergrams for rapid hematolymphoid malignancy classification: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid screening of hematolymphoid malignancies (HMs) by complete blood cell count (CBC) is crucial for choosing the next appropriate workup and initiating timely treatment for critical cases such as acute promyelocytic leukemia. Commonly presented as leukocytosis and abnormal differential, HMs could be misdiagnosed with diverse etiologies including reactive status of bacterial or viral infection, which also require early diagnosis and treatment to prevent severity, such as sepsis. Conventional workflow based on morphology review for HM screening remains time-consuming, labor-intensive, expertise-dependent and subjective. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable and cost-effective artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted model, to enable rapid and accurate prediction of HMs mixed with acute bacterial and viral infection, thus informing proper further workup and timely treatment.
methodsWe retrospectively collected a multicenter dataset containing 4996 CBC records from patients presented with leukocytosis and finally diagnosed of either diseases from six prevalent HMs and acute bacterial and/or acute viral infection for model development and validation. This eight-nomial classification model, on a multimodal basis, integrates the digit parameters and its matching WBC differential scattergram from a single CBC test via a convolutional fusion deep neural network, and was compared with the digit- and scattergram-based unimodal model, as well as the current CBC review rules for performance evaluation.
resultsThe multimodal mDNN-cHM outperformed either unimodal model, as is demonstrated by metrics including precision, recall, F1-score and accuracy (all p < 0.05). The model showed striking diagnostic accuracy in both internal and external validations (the area under the ROC curve [AUC-ROC] all above 0.95, ranging from 0.98-1.00 internally and 0.95-1.00 externally). Further, mDNN-cHM demonstrated a higher prediction rate than the flag prompt by the current CBC review rules.
conclusionsOur study presents a proof-of-concept AI classifier for HMs in a real-time manner, which potentially maximizes the diagnostic value of the low-cost and widely-accessible CBC within 0.5 h after sample receipt. The framework also underscores the potential of interpretable AI in accelerating early disease diagnosis, mitigating human error and enlightening clinical decision-making via CBC, which complements and enhances standard-of-care diagnostics, particularly for urgent and high-risk diseases including leukemia/lymphoma and acute infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.