ArticleBMC health services research2026
Exploring women's views on factors influencing the quality of maternal care among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso: a fuzzy cognitive mapping study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite major investments to improve access to maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa, quality of care remains a critical barrier to reducing maternal mortality. Women's perspectives are vital for understanding what constitutes quality and identifying priorities for improvement, yet they are rarely integrated into quality measurement frameworks. This study aimed to determine and describe the aspects that women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso consider most important in defining the quality of maternal healthcare.
methodsThis study used a qualitative participatory approach using fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) to describe and visualize women's views on quality of maternal care. 32 women of reproductive age identified and weighted factors influencing their experiences, creating visual maps. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling, stratified by age and maternal status. Four FCM sessions were conducted each in two regions, one rural and one urban. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and centrality measures to categorize influencing factors and determine their relative importance.
resultsWomen identified inadequate medical equipment, provider availability, hygiene standards, continuity of care, and provider-patient interactions as the strongest determinants of maternal care quality. Emotional support, respectful communication, and the quality of reception at facilities were also emphasized as essential components of positive care experiences. Some indicators commonly used in existing frameworks were rarely mentioned, while women emphasized interpersonal and contextual dimensions often overlooked in standard measures.
conclusionFuzzy cognitive mapping provided a participatory and visual approach to capturing women's lived experiences and perceptions of quality of maternal care The findings suggest that current measures of quality of care may not fully reflect women's priorities or experiences. Integrating their perspectives into quality measurement frameworks is essential to ensure that maternal care is assessed accurately and that interventions are patient-centered and responsive to women's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.