Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421154›Full record

ReviewBMC global and public health2026

Challenges in conducting research in community settings and community engagement strategies in response.

Tanvir C Turin, Nashit Chowdhury, Mohammad M H Raihan, Renzo Masiclat, Nafiza Rahman, Nahid Rumana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tanvir C TurinDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. turin.chowdhury@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-5050
Nashit ChowdhuryDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mohammad M H RaihanDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Renzo MasiclatDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nafiza RahmanCommunity Scholar and Citizen Researcher, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nahid RumanaCommunity Scholar and Citizen Researcher, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional research paradigms have often treated communities primarily as passive sources of data, resulting in extractive practices that overlook local priorities and knowledge systems. Community-Based Research (CBR) challenges this dynamic by emphasizing equitable co-ownership of research processes, shared decision-making, and active participation of community members  throughout the research process. This review article examines  challenges in conducting CBR and how multifaceted community engagement strategies can serve as an essential response. Specifically, the review uses a framework-mapping approach to explore their areas of relevance and contribution. The challenges span multiple dimensions, including ethical and equitable partnerships, collaboratively defining research priorities, co-designing methods, fostering community capacity, ensuring sustainability of partnerships, and meaningfully assessing outcomes over time. Importantly, these challenges are not static; they shift in nature and intensity across different stages of the research lifecycle and vary according to community, cultural, and contextual factors. Mapping these challenges against community engagement frameworks highlights areas of convergence and complementarity, illustrating how different approaches contribute to addressing distinct aspects of CBR. The review underscores that addressing these challenges requires flexible, relational approaches rooted in genuine power-sharing, supported by institutional commitment to long-term collaboration. Embedding comprehensive, context-specific engagement strategies into CBR is critical to ensuring research is methodologically sound, socially responsive, culturally attuned, and co-owned by communities. No single framework fully encompasses the breadth of challenges encountered in CBR, underscoring the value of integrating complementary engagement approaches. Such practices enable research to move beyond knowledge extraction toward a collaborative and transformative endeavor conducted with, by, and for communities.

Indexed as

Community Based ResearchCommunity EngagementMeta Research

Identifiers

PMID42421154
PMCPMC13348294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.