ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2026
Association Between Statin Initiation and Myasthenia Gravis Crisis.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Statin Therapy and Myasthenic Crisis: Is It a Transient Signal or a Clinically Meaningful Risk?Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeStatins are widely prescribed for preventing cardiovascular disease, but concerns remain that they may trigger or exacerbate myasthenia gravis (MG). We evaluated whether statin initiation increases the risk of an MG crisis using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design.
methodsThis SCCS study analyzed nationwide Korean claims data from 2007 to 2023. We included patients in whom statin therapy was initiated after an MG diagnosis and who experienced at least one MG crisis during a 730-day period spanning from 365 days before to 365 days after statin initiation. The primary outcome was an MG crisis during a 365 days follow-up. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional Poisson regression models.
resultsAmong 16,268 patients with MG in the claims database, 45 patients meeting the study inclusion criteria were included in the SCCS analysis. The risk of an MG crisis was higher during the first 30 days following statin initiation (IRR=3.60, 95% CI=1.50-8.64), but not during later periods (31-90 days: IRR=1.00, 95% CI=0.34-2.95; 91-180 days: IRR=0.87, 95% CI=0.34-2.23; 181-365 days: IRR=0.73, 95% CI=0.32-1.67). Subgroup analyses showed that the risk was higher in patients aged ≥65 years (IRR=10.31, 95% CI=2.59-41.05) and females (IRR=3.71, 95% CI=1.18-11.66). The findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsStatin initiation was associated with an increased risk of an MG crisis during the early postinitiation period, with no evidence of an elevated risk during longer-term use. Close monitoring is recommended during the early phase of statin therapy in patients with MG, particularly in the elderly, females, and users of lipophilic statins or concomitant beta blockers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.