Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421639›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

The richness, frequency and relatedness components of mate diversity and mate portfolios.

Lawrence D Harder, Mason W Kulbaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence D HarderDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-5076
Mason W KulbabaDepartment of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, St. Mary's University, Calgary, AB, T2X 1Z4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-7089

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 102018-03907University of Calgary URGC Seed Grant 1032069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual reproduction produces genetically diverse families, especially when individuals mate with multiple partners. During mating, an individual accumulates a mate portfolio, the diversity of which depends on the number of mates, their relative mating contributions and characteristics. Nevertheless, studies of mate diversity generally focus on mate number or correlated mating, the probability that pairs of offspring are full siblings. Furthermore, mate diversity is usually quantified for incomplete samples that underestimate diversity because rare mates are underrepresented. Here, we demonstrate the application of methods developed in the context of species diversity to quantify and compare mate diversity. These methods are based on Hill numbers, which represent the spectrum of mate diversity from mate number (richness), through proportional representation of relative mate contributions (Shannon diversity), to emphasis on dominant mates (including Simpson diversity and the inverse of correlated mating). Hill-number estimates can also be extrapolated to a common sample coverage, enabling standardized comparisons among portfolios, populations and species. In addition to comprehensive quantification, these methods expose new perspectives on mate diversity and provide means for their future analysis.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenetic VariationReproductioncorrelated matingHill numbersmate diversitymate portfoliomate richnessShannon diversitySimpson diversity

Identifiers

PMID42421639
PMCPMC13491301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.