Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421646›Full record

ReviewCancer2026

Circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: Evidence, challenges, next steps.

Serena Di Cosimo, Valentina Appierto, Carolina Reduzzi, Loris De Cecco, Carmine Valenza, Lorenzo Gerratana, Elisa Agostinetto, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Michail Ignatiadis, Javier Cortes and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Serena Di CosimoDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-8052
Valentina AppiertoDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-6981
Carolina ReduzziLiquid Biopsy Platform, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Loris De CeccoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Carmine ValenzaDivision of New Drug and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo GerratanaDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Elisa AgostinettoService de Oncologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Antonio Llombart-CussacMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Michail IgnatiadisService de Oncologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Javier CortesMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Massimo CristofanilliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Nicola FuscoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDivision of New Drug and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-2518
Giancarlo PruneriDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a tumor-derived, circulating bioanalyte that can be detected in blood using minimally invasive, blood-based biomarker procedures and has prognostic value in early breast cancer. Quantitative features of ctDNA, including baseline detectability and levels, have shown prognostic potential in early breast cancer by reflecting tumor burden and biologic aggressiveness, thereby supporting risk stratification. Post-treatment ctDNA detection may identify minimal residual disease and can precede radiologic or symptomatic recurrence by several months to years. Nevertheless, ctDNA has not yet been adopted in routine clinical practice in early breast cancer, partly because of biologic constraints, including low and heterogeneous tumor DNA shedding, as well as pre-analytical and analytical variability that can affect testing sensitivity. Ongoing efforts are focused on methodological standardization and clarification of the clinically actionable context. This narrative review examines the challenges in applying ctDNA to early breast cancer, spanning patient selection, sampling logistics, specimen handling, assay performance, and sources of assay failure. The authors outline determinants of ctDNA measurement that restrict the proportion of evaluable patients and limit translation to clinical practice and then summarize evidence supporting ctDNA for early response monitoring during neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative minimal residual disease detection, and longitudinal molecular surveillance. Finally, ctDNA-guided therapeutic interception strategies and emerging multimodal cell-free DNA approaches are discussed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcirculating tumor DNAearly breast cancerminimal residual disease (MRD)precision oncologysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42421646
PMCPMC13368388

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.