Evidence mapPaperPMID 42421755Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.

Mak B Djulbegovic, Nedym Hadzijahic, David J Taylor Gonzalez, Michael Antonietti, Sidra Zafar, Ajay E Kuriyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mak B DjulbegovicWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nedym HadzijahicUniversity of Miami, Miami, Florida.
David J Taylor GonzalezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Broward Health North, Pompano Beach, Florida.
Michael AntoniettiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sidra ZafarWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ajay E KuriyanWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains a major cause of failure after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair and lacks effective pharmacologic therapies. Although epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is central to PVR pathogenesis, the structural determinants governing the tractability of EMT regulators, particularly those involving intrinsic disorder, remain poorly defined. We developed a disorder-aware, artificial intelligence-enabled computational framework to evaluate EMT-associated proteins in PVR and prioritize structurally tractable regulators for structure-based targeting. Design: A computational, hypothesis-generating study employing an in silico screening and structural modeling pipeline. Subjects: No human subjects or biological specimens were included. The dataset comprised 25 EMT-associated proteins implicated in PVR, curated through a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature. Methods: Candidate proteins were evaluated using a multistage pipeline integrating intrinsic disorder profiling (Rapid Intrinsic Disorder Analysis Online), redox-sensitive disorder-to-order transition (DOT) analysis (AIUPred), and protein-protein interaction network assessment (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins [STRING]). Structure-based modeling and generative binder design were then applied to the top-ranked candidate using RFdiffusion for de novo backbone generation, protein message passing neural network for sequence design, and AlphaFold2 for structural validation. Main Outcome Measures: Primary measures were the proportion of intrinsically disordered residues, redox-sensitive disorder change, STRING network coherence within EMT-related pathways, and the structural consistency of the designed binder-target complex, assessed by root mean square deviation (RMSD) and mean per-residue confidence (predicted local distance difference test [pLDDT]). Results: Of the 25 EMT-associated proteins screened, several exhibited intermediate intrinsic disorder profiles and measurable DOT potential. Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 1 (SNAIL1) emerged as the highest-priority candidate, demonstrating an intermediate intrinsic disorder profile (∼35%), a pronounced redox-sensitive DOT region, and selective connectivity within EMT-related signaling networks. Functional mapping of the SNAIL1 C-terminal DOT segment identified 6 basic residues with literature-supported or motif-based regulatory significance (K187, R191, R224, K234, K253, and R264). Following sequence design and structural validation, the top-ranked binder exhibited the lowest structural deviation within the generated ensemble (RMSD 18.5 Å) and high per-residue confidence (mean pLDDT 0.84). Conclusions: Our study introduces a disorder-informed computational framework for prioritizing structurally tractable EMT regulators in PVR. As a proof-of-concept, the pipeline nominates SNAIL1 and generates a structure-aware de novo binder targeting its C-terminal DOT region, providing a foundation for disorder-based therapeutic discovery in fibrotic retinal disease. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionIntrinsic disorderProliferative vitreoretinopathySNAIL1

Identifiers

PMID42421755
PMCPMC13343151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.