ArticleNature. Mental health2026
A precision medicine trial of bupropion and sertraline for major depressive disorder using a biomarker-guided sequential multiple-assignment design.
Article in Nature. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05537584 (SMART Trial to Predict Anhedonia Response to Antidepressant Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SMART Trial to Predict Anhedonia Response to Antidepressant Treatment
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifing two distinct cortical progression subtypes of Parkinson's disease through multimodal neuroimaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Research agenda to advance anhedonia assessment, understanding and treatment: an ECNP-GALENOS expert meeting report.BMJ mental health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains challenging as only 30-50% of patients respond to first-line antidepressant medications in primary care. Here we developed algorithms using predictors of response to sertraline and bupropion from a multisite study, and tested such markers in an independent, prospective clinical trial involving unmedicated individuals with MDD (NCT05537584). Leave-one-out cross-validation models achieved good performance in the training sample (area under the curve of 0.66-0.86). In the preregistered clinical trial, no significant differences in treatment outcomes emerged for those assigned a drug consistent versus inconsistent with their biomarkers. However, significant differences emerged in symptom reduction trajectories for those with positive markers for both medications (response rate: 71.4%) or either drug (65.4%) compared with those with two negative markers (42.9%). This is the first study using biobehavioral markers to prospectively guide assignment to two widely used antidepressants, yielding a 66.8% boost in response rate and providing foundations for larger personalized treatment studies of MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.