ArticleJAMIA open2026
User-centered design of a patient-generated health data mobile application for primary care visits for older adults with chronic pain.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To design the provider-facing side of an application that collects and displays contextual patient-generated health data (PGHD) as a means of facilitating patient-centered care for older adults with chronic pain in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Materials and Methods: We conducted one-on-one user-centered design (UCD) sessions with VHA clinicians who care for veterans age 65 years and older with chronic pain. We elicited information about clinical practices, barriers and facilitators to working with patients with chronic pain, and types of patient information that could provide utility in the delivery of care. We displayed a wireframe prototype of the PGHD application to elicit feedback and preferences about information to collect, desired functionality, visual design, and possible workflows. Results: From 21 UCD sessions with clinicians, we identified 3 overarching themes: (1) specific contextual information could facilitate patient-centered care for older adults with chronic pain (information needs); (2) clinicians have specific desired uses for PGHD (functional requirements); and (3) clinicians have specific beliefs about how PGHD can and should be integrated into clinical practice (implementation strategies). Discussion: PGHD integration in clinical care for older adults with chronic pain was perceived favorably among VHA clinicians, with specific utility for this technology anticipated. The ways in which PGHD is accessed, integrated, and shared were perceived as critically important to its future implementation and potential for improving patient-centered care. Conclusion: Display of contextual PGHD from older adults with chronic pain is promising to VHA clinicians, but barriers to implementation in clinical practice need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.