ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effects of intermittent fasting combined with resistance training on training adaptations: an exploratory multilevel meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intermittent fasting (IF) is increasingly combined with resistance training (RT), yet its effects on RT-specific adaptations remain unclear because previous reviews have mainly focused on body composition and metabolic outcomes. Objective: This exploratory multilevel meta-analysis compared IF combined with RT versus RT alone for training adaptations, including maximal strength, local muscular endurance, hypertrophy-related outcomes, and explosive/high-speed performance. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus were searched to 10 March 2026. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed English-language randomized parallel-group or crossover interventions comparing IF plus RT with RT alone for at least 4 weeks in generally healthy participants. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Hedges' g values based on between-group change scores were pooled using multilevel random-effects models with cluster-robust variance estimation. Results: Eleven studies involving 303 participants were included. Participants were mostly young adults, with varied training status and body-composition profiles. Interventions lasted 4 weeks to 12 months, most commonly used time-restricted eating/feeding, and generally matched RT programs between arms. IF plus RT produced broadly similar training adaptations to RT alone overall ( Conclusion: Current limited evidence does not indicate that IF combined with RT clearly compromises chronic RT-related adaptations when RT and nutritional support are reasonably maintained. Further well-controlled research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.