ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Machine learning-driven discovery of antimicrobial peptides against
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Antibiotic resistance has become a global health crisis, driving the urgent need for novel antibacterial strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have emerged as promising therapeutic candidates due to their broad-spectrum activity and low propensity for resistance development. However, conventional discovery approaches remain time-consuming and inefficient for large-scale screening. Methods: In this study, we developed an integrated prediction framework that combines deep learning with classical machine learning methods to enable rapid and accurate identification of AMPs. The model was applied to screen over 250,000 artificially generated peptide sequences. Candidate peptides were selected based on physicochemical descriptors and activity-associated features, followed by solid-phase synthesis and minimum inhibitory concentration assays against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mechanistic investigations were conducted using scanning electron microscopy to visualize membrane damage, molecular dynamics simulations to probe peptide-membrane interactions, and transcriptomic profiling to assess bacterial stress responses and metabolic pathway alterations. Results: Ten promising antibacterial candidates were successfully identified and experimentally validated. All selected peptides exhibited measurable activity against P. aeruginosa, with several showing potent inhibitory effects. Microscopic and simulation analyses confirmed that the peptides exert their antibacterial effects primarily through membrane disruption. Transcriptomic data further revealed that these peptides interfere with key metabolic pathways and activate bacterial stress response systems. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that the integrated deep learning-machine learning pipeline offers an efficient and reliable approach for large-scale AMP discovery. The mechanistic insights gained from this study not only validate the predicted candidates but also provide a foundation for rational optimization of peptide-based therapeutics. This comprehensive strategy holds promise for accelerating the development of next-generation alternatives to conventional antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.