Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Computer-aided drug discovery: historical foundations, practical AI tools, and emerging ethical considerations.

Rebekah Clarke, Giuseppe Palazzo, Jiri Ruzicka, Salvatore Ferla, Marcella Bassetto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebekah ClarkeMedical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe PalazzoMedical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Jiri RuzickaSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Salvatore FerlaMedical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Marcella BassettoSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) has become an integral component of modern drug development, supporting hit identification, lead optimisation, and candidate refinement across both academia and industry. Over 4 decades of methodological progress have contributed to the discovery or optimisation of several approved therapeutics, establishing CADD as a crucial element of drug research. In parallel, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have introduced a new generation of practical tools that offer improved predictive performance, accessible software implementations, and increasing integration into everyday drug discovery and pharmacology workflows. This review provides a concise historical overview of CADD, with an updated account of approved drugs and clinical-stage candidates whose discovery or optimisation has involved computational methods and highlights a curated set of contemporary AI and ML tools that are readily usable by non-specialists. In addition, we compile and analyse two comprehensive, practice-oriented resources: a collection of cloud-based virtual-screening platforms, and an extensive suite of freely accessible ADMET prediction tools, offering medicinal chemists a consolidated guide to open-source computational workflows. Finally, we discuss emerging ethical considerations, including data bias, transparency, computational costs, and the environmental impact of large-scale models, outlining responsible paths for the continued adoption of AI in drug discovery.

Indexed as

ADMET predictionartificial intelligencecomputational pharmacologycomputer-aided drug discoverymachine learningvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID42422074
PMCPMC13341473

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.