SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2026
Comparison of the effects of different traditional Chinese exercises on improving the motor function of stroke survivors: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke survivors frequently present with varying degrees of sensory, cognitive, language, and motor impairments. Traditional Chinese exercises have been widely used as adjunctive rehabilitation therapies because they combine low-to-moderate intensity physical training, balance practice, proprioceptive stimulation, motor relearning, respiratory regulation, and cognitive engagement. However, intervention protocols and outcome measures vary substantially across trials, and direct head-to-head comparisons among Tai Chi, Baduanjin, Wuqinxi, Yijinjing, and standard of care remain scarce. This network meta-analysis therefore compared the relative effectiveness of different traditional Chinese exercise modalities for improving post-stroke motor outcomes. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data from database inception to January 2026 for RCTs evaluating traditional Chinese exercises for post-stroke motor dysfunction. Eligible participants were adults with clinically diagnosed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the acute, subacute, or chronic stage. The primary outcomes were upper- and lower-extremity motor function assessed using the FMA-UE and FMA-LE. Secondary outcomes were balance function assessed using the BBS and activities of daily living assessed using the BI. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, and intervention rankings were estimated using the SUCRA. Results: Fifty RCTs involving 3,718 participants were included. Compared with standard of care, Tai Chi and Wuqinxi showed statistically significant improvements in FMA-UE scores, whereas Baduanjin, Tai Chi, and Wuqinxi improved FMA-LE scores. All four exercise modalities were associated with significant improvements in BBS and BI scores. Ranking results suggested that Tai Chi had the highest probability of improving FMA-UE, Wuqinxi ranked highest for FMA-LE, Yijinjing ranked highest for BBS, and Baduanjin ranked highest for BI. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261323853, CRD420261323853.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.