Evidence mapPaperPMID 42422255Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Spinal infections.

Huozong Cao, Feng Xue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huozong CaoPeking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng XuePeking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal infection is a serious and increasingly concerning condition within orthopedics and infectious diseases, with a gradually rising incidence in recent years. This trend is closely associated with the aging population, an increase in invasive spinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, a growing immunocompromised population, and the prevalence of drug-resistant strains. Due to the atypical early symptoms of spinal infection, along with the diversity of causative pathogens and the deep-seated location of the infection, clinical misdiagnosis or delayed treatment is common. In severe cases, spinal infection can lead to vertebral destruction, spinal deformity, neurological impairment, and even paralysis, imposing a heavy burden on patients and society. This article aims to systematically summarize the current general understanding of spinal infection, with an emphasis on its epidemiological characteristics, distribution of common pathogens, typical and atypical clinical manifestations, the diagnostic value of imaging and laboratory tests, strategies for etiological identification, and the principles of selecting medical versus surgical treatment. By integrating existing evidence and clinical experience, this review is expected to provide clinicians with a systematic diagnostic approach and treatment reference when facing suspected or confirmed cases of spinal infection, thereby improving early recognition and patient prognosis.

Indexed as

diagnosispyogenic spondylitisspinal infectionspondylodiscitistreatmenttuberculous spondylitis

Identifiers

PMID42422255
PMCPMC13342041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.