ReviewTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2026
Making a case for using MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder and complex PTSD: a descriptive systematic review of the literature.
Review in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP) has demonstrated considerable efficacy in treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD and complex PTSD (CPTSD) frequently co-occur with borderline personality disorder (BPD), a complex disorder marked by emotional dysregulation, interpersonal difficulties and abandonment fears - often accompanied by suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury. While MDMA-AP is beneficial for PTSD and hypothesised to be effective for BPD, its application to CPTSD and BPD has not been systematically reviewed. Objectives: To systematically evaluate primary evidence on the use of MDMA-AP in treating PTSD, CPTSD, and BPD. Design: Descriptive systematic review. Data sources and methods: A systematic search of four databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, APA PsycINFO and CENTRAL) identified 24 eligible peer-reviewed studies published before 17 February 2025. Risk of bias and data extraction were conducted independently using standardised methods. Results: Of the 24 studies involving 335 participants, 15 reported outcomes from seven clinical trials, four were case reports, and five were non-randomised interventions. Four studies included participants with multiple forms of trauma, and three included those with dissociative PTSD. Most reported reduced PTSD symptoms post-intervention; some noted decreased dissociative symptoms at higher MDMA doses. Six studies did not exclude participants with BPD. Although none directly assessed MDMA-AP for CPTSD or BPD, improvements in emotional regulation, interpersonal functioning, identity coherence and abandonment concerns were reported. Adverse drug reactions were mild to moderate, although specific safety concerns remain. Conclusion: Findings from this review suggest that MDMA-AP may have applicability beyond PTSD, with potential benefits for CPTSD and BPD, offering preliminary insights to inform future research and clinical considerations. Protocol registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42025594896.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.