ArticleJournal of global health2026
What happens when public primary care is ill-prepared to respond to non-communicable diseases: a mixed-method study of diabetes and hypertension care in urban Nepal.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With rapid urbanisation in low- and middle-income countries, public primary care is struggling to respond to the growing prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, while the private sector has grown to meet demand. We aimed to understand current use and readiness of public and private primary care diabetes and hypertension services, and how readiness impacts perceptions and practices of urban communities. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study in Nepal, including mapping of diabetes and hypertension services in 134 public and private facilities; participatory social mapping, transect walks combined with six focus groups and nine interviews with marginalised urban communities and 15 city and health system actors to understand perceptions and service use. We used descriptive statistics to assess service readiness and thematic analysis of our qualitative and participatory data. Results: Of the 660 facilities mapped, 134 facilities provided diabetes and hypertension services, and 63% were private. Median service readiness scores were similarly low for hypertension and diabetes across public and private primary care. Trained human resources and the availability of guidelines scored the lowest within this overall score. Qualitative findings highlighted a lack of willingness to take long-term medication, high use of pharmacies, and acceptance of hypertension and diabetes as part of ageing. Attempts to improve behaviours were undermined by the living and working conditions facing marginalised urban communities. Conclusions: While both public and private primary care services are diagnosing and managing hypertension and diabetes, few have appropriate training or guidelines. This undermines patient trust, with many self-managing through pharmacies and non-allopathic medicines. Limited population and routine health data, coupled with a lack of data about the urban poor, weaken the ability of city and health system actors to plan health services, particularly targeting marginalised city residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.