ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Stigma Profiles and Psychosocial Correlates Among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Latent Class Analysis.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study aimed to identify latent stigma classes among women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), examine psychosocial correlates of class membership, and inform stratified psychosocial support.
methodsA convenience sample of 308 women with POP was recruited from the gynecology departments of three tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China, between August 2023 and August 2024. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the 28-item General Health Questionnaire, the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness, and the Perceived Social Support Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify stigma subgroups, followed by univariate analyses and multinomial logistic regression.
resultsFour stigma classes were identified: low stigma (50.97%), moderate stigma (24.03%), moderate internalized/low enacted stigma (13.96%), and high stigma (11.04%). Significant class differences were found in age, educational level, comorbid gynecological diseases, psychological health, and perceived social support. Poorer psychological health was consistently associated with all non-low-stigma groups. Lower perceived social support was particularly associated with the moderate internalized/low enacted stigma and high-stigma groups, whereas age was associated only with the moderate-stigma group.
conclusionsStigma among women with POP is heterogeneous. Stratified psychosocial care, especially routine psychological assessment and support-focused interventions, may be useful for higher-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423706What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.