ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
BrainGAN Framework for Generating Synthetic Contrast-Enhanced Multisequence MRI in Brain Metastases.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) is routinely used to evaluate brain metastases (BMs); however, concerns regarding gadolinium-based contrast agents have prompted interest in alternative image generation strategies. This study investigated the technical feasibility of generating synthetic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1) and FLAIR (CE-FLAIR) images from noncontrast T1- and T2-weighted MRI using the BrainGAN generative adversarial network (GAN) framework. This retrospective study included 83 patients with 16,250 matched T1/CE-T1 pairs and 100 patients with 2810 matched T2/CE-FLAIR pairs. Within the BrainGAN framework, four GAN architectures (Pix2PixHD, CycleGAN, C-CycleGAN, and CGAN) were trained using boundary-aware conditional inputs. Data were split into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%) sets. Image synthesis performance was evaluated using adversarial and VGG-based perceptual losses and quantitative metrics including mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Qualitative evaluation employed a visual Turing test conducted by expert neuroradiologists and repeated after 1 month. GAN losses decreased progressively, and VGG-based perceptual losses from T1- and T2-weighted inputs showed strong correlation (r = 0.90). Pix2PixHD achieved the highest performance (T1: SSIM 0.90, PSNR 29.2 dB; T2: SSIM 0.90, PSNR 27.3 dB), while CGAN showed the lowest (T1: SSIM 0.30, PSNR 19.1 dB; T2: SSIM 0.20, PSNR 18.5 dB). The overall visual Turing test accuracy was 61.4%. The BrainGAN framework enables the synthesis of CE-T1 and CE-FLAIR images from noncontrast MRI with consistent quantitative performance and reproducible qualitative characteristics, supporting the technical feasibility of multisequence synthetic contrast generation in neuro-oncologic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423850What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.