ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Malnutrition Is Common in Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: A Prospective Study Using Validated Nutritional Assessment Tools.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) can impair nutritional status due to recurrent episodes of nausea and vomiting, yet systematic data are lacking. We aimed to evaluate nutritional status in adults with CVS using validated assessment tools.
methodsIn a prospective study of adults diagnosed with CVS based on Rome IV criteria, nutritional status was evaluated using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA-SF) completed by participants, the PG-SGA completed by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). KEY
resultsAmong 80 participants (mean age 39 ± 16 years) 77.5% (n = 62) were female, and 85% (n = 68) had moderate-to-severe CVS. Based on the PG-SGA-SF, 70% (n = 56) were at risk of malnutrition (42.5%, n = 34 severe; 27.5%, n = 22 moderate). More than half (41; 51%) were at risk for malnutrition (MST score ≥ 2). Despite this, 27% (n = 22) were obese, and 20% (n = 16) were overweight. Mean BMI did not differ between well-nourished and malnourished participants (28.4 ± 8.2 kg/m CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Most adults with CVS met criteria for malnutrition, indicating a need for referral to an RDN. BMI should not be used as a screening tool for malnutrition, and mechanisms underlying obesity in CVS warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.