Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42423960›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Mechanical Stimulation in Bone-on-Chip Platforms: A Systematic Review of Osteogenic Responses in Medical and Dental Applications.

Astero Maria Theodosaki, Chrysa Tsiavaki, Foteini Machla, Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Dimitrios Tortopidis, Maria Kokoti, Athina Bakopoulou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Astero Maria TheodosakiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-6051
Chrysa TsiavakiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7087-2848
Foteini MachlaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-6519
Ioannis FragkioudakisDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-0686
Dimitrios TortopidisDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-9184
Maria KokotiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-9127
Athina BakopoulouDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. abakopoulou@dent.auth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-6788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone healing, remodeling, and pathology are strongly regulated by mechanical stimulation. However, conventional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro culture systems fail to reproduce the complex mechanical and biological microenvironment of human bone, limiting their translational relevance. In recent years, bone-on-chip (BoC) platforms, as part of the broader organ-on-chip (OoC) technology, have emerged as advanced microfluidic systems that enable the study of bone biology under dynamic and highly controlled conditions that more closely mimic in vivo physiology. This systematic review aimed to gather the available in vitro evidence on mechanically stimulated BoC models, with a particular focus on osteogenic differentiation outcomes and the technical characteristics underlying these platforms. Following a comprehensive literature search and structured data extraction, biological parameters (cell types, culture conditions, scaffolds), chip design and fabrication strategies, mechanical loading modalities, and assessment assays were systematically analyzed. Across the included studies, fluid shear stress was the most frequently applied mechanical stimulus and was generally associated with enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with static cultures, although substantial heterogeneity was observed in loading protocols and outcome measures. Overall, this review provides a consolidated technical and biological overview of mechanically stimulated BoC systems and highlights key methodological considerations for future platform development. By integrating microengineering approaches with bone and stem cell biology, BoC models hold significant potential for advancing bone tissue engineering, mechanobiology research, and translational applications, including dentistry-related bone regeneration and biomaterial testing.

Indexed as

Bone-on-chipBone tissue engineeringDental applicationsMechanical stimulationMicrofluidic culture systemsOsteogenic differentiation

Identifiers

PMID42423960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.