ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Mechanical Stimulation in Bone-on-Chip Platforms: A Systematic Review of Osteogenic Responses in Medical and Dental Applications.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone healing, remodeling, and pathology are strongly regulated by mechanical stimulation. However, conventional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro culture systems fail to reproduce the complex mechanical and biological microenvironment of human bone, limiting their translational relevance. In recent years, bone-on-chip (BoC) platforms, as part of the broader organ-on-chip (OoC) technology, have emerged as advanced microfluidic systems that enable the study of bone biology under dynamic and highly controlled conditions that more closely mimic in vivo physiology. This systematic review aimed to gather the available in vitro evidence on mechanically stimulated BoC models, with a particular focus on osteogenic differentiation outcomes and the technical characteristics underlying these platforms. Following a comprehensive literature search and structured data extraction, biological parameters (cell types, culture conditions, scaffolds), chip design and fabrication strategies, mechanical loading modalities, and assessment assays were systematically analyzed. Across the included studies, fluid shear stress was the most frequently applied mechanical stimulus and was generally associated with enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with static cultures, although substantial heterogeneity was observed in loading protocols and outcome measures. Overall, this review provides a consolidated technical and biological overview of mechanically stimulated BoC systems and highlights key methodological considerations for future platform development. By integrating microengineering approaches with bone and stem cell biology, BoC models hold significant potential for advancing bone tissue engineering, mechanobiology research, and translational applications, including dentistry-related bone regeneration and biomaterial testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42423960What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.