Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424314›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Dipteran flight diversity is shaped by aerodynamic constraints, scaling, and evolutionary trade-offs.

Camille Le Roy, Ilam Bharathi, Thomas Engels, Florian T Muijres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille Le RoyExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-296X
Ilam BharathiExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-6219
Thomas EngelsISM, CNRS & Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-1054
Florian T MuijresExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-0653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight has been a key innovation in insect evolution, yet the selective and mechanistic pressures shaping their flight motor systems remain poorly understood. Here, we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of flight in Diptera (true flies), integrating morphology, wingbeat kinematics, and aerodynamics within a phylogenetic framework. We quantified morphology in 133 species spanning the Dipteran phylogenetic and size range, and for a subset of 46 species, we combined high-speed stereoscopic videography with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to characterize wingbeat kinematics and aerodynamic performance, respectively. Our results reveal that morphology is strongly structured by phylogeny, whereas wingbeat kinematics are broadly conserved across Diptera, reflecting dominant aerodynamic constraints. Two early-diverged lineages, Culicomorpha (mosquitoes and midges) and Tipulomorpha (crane flies), exhibit strikingly divergent kinematics and aerodynamics, suggesting lineage-specific selective pressures. Combining these data with scaling analyses shows that maintaining in-flight weight support across the dipteran size range requires systematic allometric adjustments in wing morphology, wingbeat kinematics, and flight musculature. Smaller dipterans achieve weight support through relatively larger wings and higher wingbeat frequencies, whereas larger dipterans achieve the same aerodynamic requirement through increased investment in flight musculature to sustain the necessary mechanical power output. These size-dependent trait combinations highlight how different morphological and kinematic adaptations evolved in response to the shared physical requirements of hovering flight across Diptera. Mosquitoes and midges represent an extreme case, exhibiting a pronounced aerodynamic-acoustic trade-off with disproportionately high wingbeat frequencies, large flight musculature and increased aerodynamic and acoustic power, consistent with selection favoring acoustic signaling during in-swarm mating. By integrating comparative morphology, kinematics, and aerodynamics across a major insect radiation, our study uncovers the interplay between physical scaling laws, aerodynamic constraints, and ecological pressures in shaping the evolution of animal flight. These findings provide a mechanistic framework for understanding how complex locomotor systems diversify under multiple selection pressures.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDipteraFlight, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHydrodynamicsPhylogenyWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID42424314
PMCPMC13349162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.