Evidence mapPaperPMID 42424323Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2026

Food Service Directors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Ultraprocessed Foods in California's San Joaquin Valley Schools.

Anjali Gupta, Alix Zuceth Duran Gomez, Donna Matheson, Aditi Sharma, Viviane Richard, Lorrene D Ritchie, Ashley de la Rosa, Deiglis Delgado, Genoveva Islas, Christina A Hecht and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anjali GuptaStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Alix Zuceth Duran GomezDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Donna MathesonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Aditi SharmaDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Viviane RichardDivision of Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lorrene D RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California.
Ashley de la RosaDolores Huerta Foundation, Bakersfield, California.
Deiglis DelgadoCultiva La Salud, Fresno, California.
Genoveva IslasCultiva La Salud, Fresno, California.
Christina A HechtNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California.
Kenneth HechtNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California.
Anisha I PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Andrea Pedroza-TobiasDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) are industrial formulations of ingredients typically not used in home cooking and often high in added sugars, saturated fat, or sodium. UPF intake is associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic diseases. Although the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program must meet US Department of Agriculture nutrition standards, federal standards do not specifically address food processing. However, reducing UPFs in schools is gaining momentum. As food service directors (FSDs) are key implementers of school nutrition policies, we sought to characterize their knowledge and beliefs about UPFs in school meals. Methods: In this qualitative study, we conducted 20 semistructured interviews with FSDs in California's low-income, largely rural San Joaquin Valley from January through June 2024. Two analysts double-coded transcripts and used inductive thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results: Of 20 FSDs, 16 completed the demographic survey. Participants' mean age was 49.5 years (IQR, 41.0-59.5), 15 were women, 8 identified as White, and 6 identified as Hispanic or Latino. Seven FSDs reported that they had never heard of UPFs. After receiving a definition, FSDs generally described UPFs as less healthy than scratch-cooked foods, although several perceived UPFs served in schools as healthier than UPFs sold elsewhere. FSDs cited student food insecurity, food safety concerns, and student acceptance as reasons for serving UPFs; others worried that serving UPFs at school could reinforce unhealthy eating habits. Conclusion: Training that is free of conflicts of interest and food labeling systems that are clearer may improve FSDs' ability to identify UPFs and implement policies to reduce UPFs in school meals.

Indexed as

Food ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSchoolsAdultCaliforniaFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42424323
PMCPMC13353300

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.