ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2026
Federated Computing in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Paradigm Shift in Collaborative Multicenter Research.
Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
➢ Multicenter studies remain rare in orthopaedics (9.9% of recent publications) due to regulatory complexity, restrictive data-sharing policies, and administrative delays, despite their proven value in generating robust, generalizable evidence. ➢ Federated computing (FC) brings analytic code to each institution's data and returns only encrypted, aggregated results. This preserves patient privacy, maintains institutional control, and streamlines compliance by reducing or eliminating the need for complex data-use agreements. ➢ Extensive applications in other medical fields show that FC can match or exceed the performance of centralized analyses across diverse data types (imaging, electronic health records, genomics, and surgical video) without centralizing sensitive information. ➢ For orthopaedics, FC enables scalable, privacy-preserving collaboration on rare events, low-frequency outcomes, and practice variation across subspecialties. Broad adoption could expand research scope, improve evidence quality, and accelerate translation of findings into clinical care. ➢ FC enables secure, privacy-preserving multicenter collaboration in orthopaedics, overcoming long-standing barriers to data-sharing and expanding the scope of clinically impactful research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.