ArticleJMIR AI2026
Effectiveness of Humanized AI Avatars and Messenger Gender for Dental Postprocedure Instructions: Two Randomized Experiments.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postcare instructions play a vital role in preventive health care. Traditionally, information on post-dental procedure care is provided through printed leaflets or brief verbal explanations, which often fail to engage patients or ensure adherence. In contrast, emerging artificial intelligence (AI) systems designed to emulate human interaction represent a promising yet understudied approach to improving patient communication and understanding. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of AI-generated avatars in communicating postprocedure dental instructions and determined how video characteristics, including avatar type (humanized, animated, or real person), AI identity disclosure, and avatar gender, impact intention to comply and comprehension. Methods: Two preregistered online randomized experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 (n=650) compared the effectiveness of a real person with humanized and animated AI avatars, with and without disclosure of the AI's identity. Experiment 2 (n=256) tested the effects of avatar gender on patient intention to comply. The primary outcomes were self-reported likelihood of following instructions, returning to the dentist, and comprehension. Results: In experiment 1, humanized AI avatars were as effective as a real person in promoting intention to comply with instructions, while animated avatars significantly reduced this intention. AI disclosure did not affect intention to comply but reduced the reported likelihood of returning to the same dentist. In experiment 2, women reported a higher intention to comply with the instructions in the man avatar condition than in the woman avatar condition. Comprehension remained high and was unaffected across conditions. Conclusions: Humanized AI avatars are an effective tool for delivering postprocedure instructions. However, design choices such as visual realism and avatar gender significantly impact patient trust and intention to comply. Avatar design should balance efficacy and ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.