ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
MIND GamePack: A novel digital health technology for assessment of participants with and without cognitive impairment.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital biomarkers offer promising avenues for enhancing the identification, prognosis, and phenotyping of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). This study evaluates the feasibility and utility of the MIND GamePack©, a digital game platform designed to measure leisure cognitive activity over time.
methodsGameplay data were collected from 60 participants across two cohorts over 3-6 months: Cohort I (no cognitive complaints) and Cohort II (subjective complaints, mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia). Analyses focused on compliance, correlation with validated neuropsychological instruments (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status [RBANS], and Trail Making Test [TMT]), test-retest reliability, and known groups comparison.
resultsThe MIND GamePack© displayed high compliance and excellent test-retest reliability within 1 week (ICC=0.81-0.95) for most selected features. Several game features displayed moderate to strong correlations with standardized neuropsychological test performance. Features related to memory tasks across select games (Normalized Accuracy and Normalized Redundant Move Variability of Memory Match and Word Repetition Rate of Word Scramble) exhibited significant associations with RBANS Sum of Index Score, TMT Part A, and MoCA, respectively. Participants without cognitive impairment exhibited improvement in features over 3 months compared to those with cognitive impairment. Baseline game features differentiated cognitively normal [CN] from cognitively impaired [CI] participants across nearly all domains after controlling for age, sex, and education (p<.01).
conclusionsThe MIND GamePack© offers a sensitive, engaging approach to cognitive monitoring and screening, with potential use for dense tracking in longitudinal research and interventional clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.