Evidence mapPaperPMID 42424838Full record

ReviewPoultry science2026

Cecal microbiota transportation, social stress, and injurious behaviors in chickens - A review.

Heng-Wei Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Heng-Wei ChengLivestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: Heng-wei.cheng@usda.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggression and injurious behaviors, including aggressive pecking, feather pecking, vent pecking, and cannibalistic pecking, pose significant health, welfare, and production challenges for laying hens and the global poultry industry. Despite the technological advancements in poultry farming practices, injurious behaviors occur in all the current housing systems. Evidence from human and laboratory mammalian studies suggests that early-life stress may impair gut microbial development and affect gut-brain axis signaling through changes in gut permeability and inflammatory pathways, resulting in neuroinflammation. As a consequence, brain damage causes mental and emotional disorders with abnormal behaviors. Therefore, intervening for maladaptive social behaviors has become a critical topic in various animals including chickens. Despite continuously evolving the outcomes of the microbiota-gut-brain axis interplay, whether similar mechanisms contribute to maladaptive or injurious behaviors in chickens remains an important area for further investigation. The reviewed issues provide an exhaustive scientific analysis of the activation of cecal microbiota transplantation in poultry and describe a potential that injurious behaviors in chickens can be reduced by modification of their gut microbiota profiles and brain serotonergic activity. The outcomes provide a novel insight into developing an intervention strategy for preventing or inhibiting injurious behaviors in chickens. To fully test the strategy, a comprehensive study is required to further explore the signaling mechanisms of cecal microbiota transplantation in injurious behaviors and its scope of application, especially in laying hens.

Indexed as

ChickenInjurious behaviorIntestinal microbiotaMicrobiota-gut-brain axisSocial stress

Identifiers

PMID42424838
PMCPMC13380169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.