ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2026
Thalassaemia.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thalassaemia syndromes, which primarily include α-thalassaemia and β-thalassaemia, are a complex group of inherited disorders affecting haemoglobin production. They are prevalent throughout the most populated parts of the world and span a wide range of severity from mild to fatal. Advances in the management of these syndromes, including blood transfusion and iron chelation, have led to substantial improvements in the life expectancy and quality of life of many patients worldwide. Nevertheless, major forms of thalassaemia are still associated with chronic comorbidities and remain an important but neglected global health burden. Prevention and advances in the treatment and management of the thalassaemia syndromes rely on the early identification of people affected, either through prenatal or premarital screening or through newborn screening or testing at later stages in life. This depends on the availability of expertise, facilities and treatment options for patients. Fast and groundbreaking developments in disease-modifying and curative gene editing therapies are promising, but not without challenges in terms of costs, accessibility and uncertainties around their long-term benefits and safety. Better awareness, patient-centred approaches and coordinated strategies are needed to reduce current inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426018What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.