Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426318›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Neural Network-Driven Finite Element Modeling for Estimating Knee Joint Cartilage Mechanical Responses.

Mahan Nematollahi, Amir Esrafilian, Jere Lavikainen, Mika E Mononen, Lauri Stenroth, Jari Arokoski, David J Saxby, David G Lloyd, Rami K Korhonen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mahan NematollahiDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Mahan.nematollahi@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6647-8866
Amir EsrafilianDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-8528
Jere LavikainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7636-8229
Mika E MononenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-8928
Lauri StenrothDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7705-9188
Jari ArokoskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rehabilitation, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-2235
David J SaxbyAustralian Centre for Precision Health and Technology (PRECISE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-7518
David G LloydAustralian Centre for Precision Health and Technology (PRECISE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-9682
Rami K KorhonenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-7855

Funding

Marie Skłodowska-Curie GA# 101108335National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia 2001734Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF21OC0065373Research council of Finland #363854Research Council of Finland #363459Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö #250109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-fidelity, artificial intelligence (AI)-generated approaches are increasingly used to estimate kinematics and kinetics of human movement, which are traditionally measured by high-fidelity motion capture (Mocap) approaches. However, there are no methods to study knee joint tissue mechanics using such low-fidelity approaches. To do so, we investigated knee cartilage stresses and strains using finite element (FE) models driven by both high- and low-fidelity motion capture methods. We performed subject-specific FE modeling on nine healthy participants to evaluate tissue mechanical responses by two different approaches. High-fidelity kinematic and kinetic data were obtained through motion capture and musculoskeletal modeling, respectively, whereas artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to estimate kinetic data from low-fidelity data (e.g., subject mass, height, age, gender, static knee abduction-adduction angle, and walking speed). These data were then used as loading inputs in the knee joint FE models that were generated from magnetic resonance images. The results indicated that the high- and low-fidelity approaches provided comparable estimates of maximum principal stress, maximum shear strain, and collagen fibril strain of tibial cartilage at the first peak of knee contact force (p > 0.05). Significant differences between the methods in the peak values of the analyzed parameters were observed at the second peak of knee contact force (p < 0.05), larger differences observed in the lateral joint compartment. However, most of these differences disappeared when comparing average values over the cartilage-cartilage contact areas. Our findings support the potential of the low-fidelity, AI-generated approach to assess tibial cartilage mechanics. This out-of-laboratory tool may enable cartilage failure prediction and improved management of osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Articular cartilageComputational modelingFinite element analysisKnee jointMachine learningMotion analysisOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.