ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Neural Network-Driven Finite Element Modeling for Estimating Knee Joint Cartilage Mechanical Responses.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-fidelity, artificial intelligence (AI)-generated approaches are increasingly used to estimate kinematics and kinetics of human movement, which are traditionally measured by high-fidelity motion capture (Mocap) approaches. However, there are no methods to study knee joint tissue mechanics using such low-fidelity approaches. To do so, we investigated knee cartilage stresses and strains using finite element (FE) models driven by both high- and low-fidelity motion capture methods. We performed subject-specific FE modeling on nine healthy participants to evaluate tissue mechanical responses by two different approaches. High-fidelity kinematic and kinetic data were obtained through motion capture and musculoskeletal modeling, respectively, whereas artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to estimate kinetic data from low-fidelity data (e.g., subject mass, height, age, gender, static knee abduction-adduction angle, and walking speed). These data were then used as loading inputs in the knee joint FE models that were generated from magnetic resonance images. The results indicated that the high- and low-fidelity approaches provided comparable estimates of maximum principal stress, maximum shear strain, and collagen fibril strain of tibial cartilage at the first peak of knee contact force (p > 0.05). Significant differences between the methods in the peak values of the analyzed parameters were observed at the second peak of knee contact force (p < 0.05), larger differences observed in the lateral joint compartment. However, most of these differences disappeared when comparing average values over the cartilage-cartilage contact areas. Our findings support the potential of the low-fidelity, AI-generated approach to assess tibial cartilage mechanics. This out-of-laboratory tool may enable cartilage failure prediction and improved management of osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426318What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.