ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
Variance-Consistent Covariate Modeling from Posterior Summaries in Population Pharmacokinetics.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSystematic covariate modeling in nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) analysis is computationally intensive due to repeated refitting to concentration-time data. Although empirical Bayes estimates (EBEs) facilitate screening, η-shrinkage attenuates between-subject variability and distorts covariance structures, leading to shrinkage bias. We propose a variance-consistent framework enabling covariate modeling from a single base-model fit.
methodsThe proposed approach incorporates subject-specific posterior means and covariances from an NLME base model. A variance-matching penalty enforces consistency between the total between-subject covariance (model-explained and unexplained) and the base model estimates, preserving the covariance structure without refitting. Performance was compared with EBE regression, two-stage Bayesian estimation, and NLME covariate modeling. Stepwise covariate selection was evaluated using likelihood ratio tests, with the resulting structure compared against the NLME-identified structure as the gold-standard reference.
resultsUnder substantial η-shrinkage of approximately 30%, EBE regression and two-stage Bayesian estimation attenuated covariate-effect parameter estimates. The proposed method provided unbiased estimates, mitigating shrinkage bias and recovering covariate-effect parameter estimates obtained with NLME. It also reproduced NLME-based stepwise covariate selection with high computational scalability by avoiding repeated refitting to time-course data.
conclusionsVariance-consistent posterior-based covariate modeling provides a statistically coherent and computationally scalable framework for systematic covariate identification in population PKPD analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426415What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.