Evidence mapPaperPMID 42426420Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2026

Cross-Sector Policies for Achieving Equitable Obesity Prevention and Food Security: A Review of Real-World Actions.

Christina Zorbas, Sally Schultz, Shu Wen Ng, Erica Reeve, Ayuba Issaka, Chioma Anidi, Kathryn Backholer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina ZorbasInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia. c.zorbas@deakin.edu.au.
Sally SchultzInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Shu Wen NgGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Erica ReeveInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Ayuba IssakaInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Chioma AnidiInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Kathryn BackholerInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, 3220, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review examines how government sectors beyond health contribute to the dual goals of equitable obesity prevention and food security through structural, cross‑sector policies. It aimed to synthesise real‑world evidence on the design, implementation and diet‑related impacts of policies across social, education, economic, trade and agricultural, and legal domains. RECENT

findingsEmerging insights highlight the need for further evaluation of how income supports contribute to diet-related health; the expansion of school meal programs given their multiple co-benefits; the feasibility and impacts of adopting health-promoting taxes that generate public revenue for equity-focused initiatives; how agricultural supports can be repurposed to improve local and equitable food access; and the use of legal instruments to hold food industries accountable and advance public health interests. Coordinated, equitable progress on obesity prevention and food security will require enhanced policy coherence, effective accountability mechanisms, better data on diet and equity outcomes for cross-sector policies, and political commitment to overcome siloed and often unbalanced decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Food SecurityFood SupplyHealth EquityHealth PolicyNutrition PolicyObesityHealth PromotionHumansPublic HealthFood policyFood securityHealth equityObesity preventionPublic policySocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID42426420
PMCPMC13350115

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.