ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Should posthumously retrieved mammalian spermatozoa be evaluated via interspecific ICSI?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are circumstances in which mammalian spermatozoa are collected and/or long-term stored under suboptimal conditions, such as during posthumous sperm retrieval. As a consequence, the sperm can exhibit lower motility, be completely immotile, or have membranes that are more or less severely damaged. With the advent of ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), either the entire sperm or only the sperm head (e.g., in the mouse) can be directly injected into a mature oocyte, thereby making motility a less critical parameter. However, if sperm were collected and stored under suboptimal conditions, blind sperm injection into oocytes seems risky, especially when oocytes are also scarce, as in the case of endangered animals. The same applies to humans, where safety and ethical considerations are primary concerns. If such sperm are intended for reproductive purposes, DNA quality and integrity should be routinely evaluated, as they are among the most important factors for embryo viability. Although there are several standard tests to assess sperm quality, they may not be sufficient when working with to a certain extent compromised samples. Here, we discuss whether, in these specialized cases, interspecific ICSI could help expand the range of tests available to assess sperm normality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.