ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
In Situ Bacterioplankton Growth Partitioning by High-Resolution Metatranscriptomics.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial communities are fundamental to marine trophic webs, elemental cycling and geochemical transformations. Yet we lack high phylogenetic resolution measurements or good indicators of how fast different taxa are actively growing in situ. Here, we use high temporal resolution transcriptomics to phylogenetically disentangle an index of growth before and after a short spring phytoplankton bloom, by quantifying the phylogenetic distribution of the expression of ftsZ, a gene encoding for a protein involved in cell division. We interpret the relative abundances of ftsZ transcripts as a general indicator of how growth was distributed amongst taxa. This expression was also compared to RNase P to estimate how each organism's transcriptional resources were allocated to replication versus other functions. During the time-series, we observed two distinct profiles: prior to and several days after the bloom, ftsZ expression was dominated by Synechococcales, Pelagibacterales and picoeukaryotes, and by Rhodobacterales, SAR92 and SAR86 as the bloom declined. Whilst similar successional patterns have been observed previously, our dataset extends these observations by resolving transcriptional and replication-associated activity at high temporal resolution, enabling the detection of disproportionate contributions during bloom development and turnover. Our approach is scalable and will inform conceptual and mechanistic models of planktonic food webs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.