ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Screening performance of sternal CT attenuation for opportunistic osteoporosis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis represents a major global public health problem, yet it remains substantially underdiagnosed. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the clinical gold standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, its routine use for population-based screening is limited. As an alternative, the use of routine computed tomography (CT) for opportunistic screening has emerged as a promising approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing sternal CT values (Hounsfield units, HU) from chest CT scans to assess osteoporosis.
methodsThis retrospective study included 145 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent chest CT and DXA within a one-month interval. CT HU values were measured at the upper, middle, and lower levels of the sternum by three independent observers. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Correlations between sternal CT values, T-score, age, and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed using Pearson correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of sternal CT HU values for identifying osteoporosis.
resultsSignificant positive correlations were observed between sternal CT HU values and DXA T-score at all measured levels (r > 0.506, P < 0.01), with the mean sternal CT value exhibiting the strongest association (r = 0.632). Inter-observer agreement was excellent across all sternal levels (ICC range: 0.926-0.980). Moreover, ROC analysis revealed that the lower sternal level provided the best diagnostic performance for osteoporosis, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8712 (95% CI: 0.8128-0.9296). An optimal cutoff value of 64.90 HU was identified, with a sensitivity of 80.9% and a specificity of 85.7%.
conclusionsSternal CT HU values measured on chest CT scans are significantly correlated with DXA-measured BMD. In particular, measurements at the lower sternal level showed the best diagnostic performance and may serve as a potential supplementary tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.