SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for lower limb motor impairment in post-stroke hemiplegia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke-related hemiplegia often results in significant lower limb dysfunction, severely affecting walking ability, balance, and daily activities. Although various non-pharmacological interventions have shown potential benefits, the optimal rehabilitation strategy remains unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and comparative ranking of non-pharmacological interventions in improving lower limb motor function, balance, walking ability, and activities of daily living in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia.
methodsWe conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2010 to August 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Review Manager 5.4 were used to assess study quality, and evidence was graded with GRADEPro. Using R Studio software, a NMA was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy of various treatments in improving lower limb motor function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The study was officially registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD420251169037.
resultsA total of 82 RCTs involving 3514 participants and 16 non-pharmacological interventions were included. The results indicated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) showed favorable effects on lower limb motor function measured by FMA-LE (MD = 3.7, 95% CI 2.5 to 4.9; SUCRA = 88.13%). rTMS also demonstrated positive effects on balance (MD = 8.5, 95% CrI: 5.1 to 11; SUCRA = 98.41%) and activities of daily living (MD = 14, 95% CrI: 11 to 16; SUCRA = 94.68%). For walking independence assessed by FAC, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed considerable effects (MD = 1.5, 95% CrI: 0.41 to 2.5; SUCRA = 87.60%). Furthermore, virtual reality combined with robotic rehabilitation showed a relatively marked effect in reducing TUG time (MD = - 6.6, 95% CrI: - 8.9 to - 4.3; SUCRA = 95.27%).
conclusionDifferent non-pharmacological interventions may provide distinct benefits for lower limb rehabilitation after stroke. rTMS appears favorable for improving motor function, balance, and daily living ability; tDCS may help enhance walking independence; and virtual reality combined with robotic rehabilitation may be beneficial for functional mobility. Further large-scale, multicenter, standardized RCTs with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426775What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.