ArticleMicrobiome2026
SubCom analysis: dissecting microbial community functions into taxon-specific contributions and interaction contexts.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrobial communities play fundamental roles in industrial processes and ecosystem stability. However, understanding how individual members and their interactions give rise to community-level function remains challenging because such functions emerge from complex interactions among diverse members.
resultsIn this study, we developed SubCom analysis, a subcommunity-based experimental-computational workflow for inferring candidate taxon-specific contributions and interaction contexts underlying microbial community function. Using an aniline-degrading microbial community, we generated paired composition-function data from 558 randomly assembled, low-complexity subcommunities constructed using a dilution-and-dispense strategy. We then trained decision-tree-based models to predict community function from composition, achieving high predictive performance (r = 0.77-0.89). Interpretation of the learned decision rules identified taxa with consistent functional association: specific Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter taxa were associated with increased community-level aniline utilization, whereas an Achromobacter taxon exhibited a negative association despite its presumed role in downstream metabolism. The models further suggested potential functional interactions, including attenuation of the positive contributions of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter in the presence of a Corynebacterium taxon, highlighting functional relationships that are not readily inferred from genome-based approaches alone. An augmentation assay using representative isolates supported the predicted direction of several effects and enabled targeted improvement of community function.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the potential of SubCom analysis as a practical framework for inferring taxon-specific contributions and interaction contexts in complex, nonsynthetic microbial communities. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.